« February 2006 | Main | April 2006 »

March 27, 2006

Quick and dirty snooping online

QUICK AND DIRTY SNOOPING ONLINE

AM NEW YORK - "THE DATING LIFE"

MARCH 27,2006

BY JULIA ALLISON

I am an inveterate, brazen and unrepentant dating snooper.

Actually, in the Age of Google-as-a-Verb, most of us are. We don't think of ourselves like this – but snooping (at least electronically) is no longer considered taboo. It's just assumed that hours after meeting someone you're interested in, you'll type their name into various search engines, followed by MySpace, Friendster and Facebook (and Match.com, Jdate and EHarmony, just in case).

Years ago, we had to rely on more primitive methods to find out essential info on our dates: checking his wallet (Photos of other woman? Different name on ID? Wedding ring?), his medicine cabinet (Prozac? Perfume? Cream for STDs?), or his underwear drawer (Porn? Gay Porn?). Yikes.

I still believe that real-world snooping has its place (we'll cover that next week), but in the meantime, you can rely on the growing range and influence of virtual methods for gathering information on your partner. Or your exes. Or their exes.

You can guess his password and check his e-mail (by far the most fun, although the password-guessing thing is hard).

You can dig up his driving convictions, criminal record, marriage certificates, and oh, child support payments (whoa).

"Maybe your daughter has a new suitor, and you worry there may be a checkered past," says one online detective service. Nice. Dad no longer needs a shotgun to scare the crap out of young men, just a T-1 line.

But why wait for your father to let you know that Perfect Boyfriend actually has several DUIs and a credit report that would scare Michael Milken?

Do it yourself, and you'll avoid the fate of one of my friends, who took five months to find out that her boyfriend saying "we're separated and living in two different homes" meant "I happen to own two homes with my wife, from whom I'm not actually separated in any way." Oops.

Nothing a little armchair detective work wouldn't have uncovered.

For the lazier (or cheaper) snoopers amongst us, I highly recommend Amazon.com's Wish List. Just type in a first and last name to see what books / DVDs / scurrilous materials come up. "Doom – The Ultimate Collector's Edition"? Ugh, loser. Seven different diet and self-help books, sanctioned by Oprah? At least you know what you're up against. "How to Marry a Multi-Millionaire: the Ultimate Guide to High Net Worth Dating"? Run! Run!!!

It won't yield the type of hard-core info that an online background check would, but it might help you judiciously fill in the holes. Furthermore, it's by far the easiest snooping to explain away, if need be. You were going to buy them a gift, obviously. So what if her birthday is 8 months from now? You don't need an occasion to buy her love (or the book she requested, "How to Cheat and Get Away With It!").

Some people find such activity unconscionable. "Snooping is just unethical," a certain prominent New York gossip columnist sputtered to me the other day. "It signifies control issues and a lack of trust." The irony doesn't escape me (He's a gossip columnist! Snooping is his job!!), but I must respectfully disagree.

Probably due to biology (isn't it always?), our natural curiosity about the world is magnified a thousand-fold when dating.

Still, you don't have to suspect your crush of being an illegal alien with a burgeoning Colombian cocaine business to desire more information about him. You might just be interested in what he does in his spare time.

But if his MySpace profile mentions skiing, you're outta there.

March 20, 2006

How long do you rebound?

HOW LONG DO YOU REBOUND?

AM NEW YORK - "THE DATING LIFE"

MARCH 20, 2006

BY JULIA ALLISON

Both of my roommates recently broke up with their long-term boyfriends, so rebounding flawlessly is our subject du jour.

Ah, Rebound Time (or RT) -- the sometimes gut-wrenching, sometimes gratifying but always cathartic experience after a big break-up. Although I'm a believer in embracing the proper RT for maximum personal growth (I love personal growth), I see women trying to exit that process as quickly as possible, which undermines its positive impact. So just how long should RT be?

Enter the new off-Broadway musical "I Love You Because," which features an actuary named Diana who comes up with a brilliant formula for determining the appropriate post-breakup Rebound Time.

Although the equations themselves were too complex to repeat verbatim, certain elements struck me as so useful that I'll paraphrase them here for you:

First, take your Relationship Length -- or RL. For the first year, give yourself six months. For every subsequent year, add half of the recovery time from the year before.

Factor in other influences -- like "how right the break-up felt" or how badly it ended. (Did she cheat on you? Did he leave you on your anniversary?)

Integrate the ARL -- or Adjusted Relationship Length -- that is, not how long you actually dated, but how long it FELT like you dated.

The ARL goes up or down according to three factors: First, what number boyfriend was he? (The Number Boyfriend Index, or NBI). Second, who broke up with whom? And finally, rate the bitterness factor (BF) on a scale of 1 to 10.

Integrate all these components (and do lots of other things with numbers I couldn't follow) and voila -- you get your RT, the "fraction of a year it takes for the pain to disappear."

Of course, it doesn't really matter what number you arrive at -- just give yourself sufficient time. Most importantly, Diana says, RT absolutely "can't be shortened… so don't even try. You can date around but then those guys will just be rebound men."

Exactly! Rebound Time is the perfect occasion to enjoy dating wildly inappropriate people because it won't (read: SHOULDN'T) turn into another relationship.

In fact, insists Diana, in order to find Mr. Right after you're done healing, it's best to date a slew of Mr. Very Wrongs while you're still wallowing in RT. You need to "hit boyfriend rock bottom" first before you start afresh.

So my very public advice to my roommates is the same as Diana's: Embrace your RT, and "find someone who's perfectly wrong." After all, "[we're] in New York, so that shouldn't take too long."

March 13, 2006

Taking a break from the same-old

TAKING A BREAK FROM THE SAME-OLD

AM NEW YORK - "THE DATING LIFE"

MARCH 13, 2006

BY JULIA ALLISON

A month ago today, men all over the city were racking their brains for creative ways to woo their women (or at least not totally make them angry) on February 14th. Even if they made it through Valentine's Day unscathed, they're not off the hook; ­after all, men are always expected to coordinate the romance. They do the asking out, they plan and pay for the date, and eventually, they buy the ring and propose.

Like a culture that sells high heels to women but wants their men to be taller, putting males on solo romantic duty is both inane and unfair.

Although I've definitely reaped the benefits of the other gender bearing a disproportionate share of the romantic burden, I think it's time for a little role reversal as we fight the End-of-Winter-But-Not-Quite-Spring New York Romantic Blahs.

Women­, tell your boyfriend/husband to pack an overnight bag, blindfold him, hop in a taxi and drive to the NYC hotel of your choice.

I did this recently with The Boyfriend, whom I took to a stunning hotel on a recent wintry evening. After a wine-soaked dinner at the in-hotel restaurant, I spirited him away to our plush room. Since he always pays and always plans, he practically cried from shock that I was actually treating HIM to something. I was very proud of myself. Now I don¹t have to do anything for him again until next Christmas.

Anyone who's organized "a little weekend away" knows that planning something special out of town can take a lot of effort ­ and a lot of cash. But with one night at a NYC hotel, there are no plane tickets to purchase and no great distance to travel. It feels utterly luxurious like a real vacation but with none of the headaches. (Not to mention that hotel rooms are very conducive to rekindling that I-Want-To-Rip-All-Your-Clothes-Off-Right-NOW spark.)

Although at first the idea of "getting a room" in NY seemed strange­--uh, we LIVE here already--now I can think of no better retreat from the chaos and chores and commotion of the everyday (and a little privacy from roommates one thin wall away).

In the end, romance for busy New Yorkers isn't about making one-half of the couple do all the work ­it's about balancing the duty to romance each other equitably. So women, you got your Valentine's Day. Now it's time to treat the men to an incredible end-of-winter mini-vacation--which has the added benefit of making him even more accountable for a stellar showing at NEXT year's February 14th. See? It all evens out.

March 01, 2006

HOTMail: The New Technology of Dating

COED MAGAZINE
MARCH 2006
BY JULIA ALLISON

A friend of mine at the University of North Carolina happily describes herself as “a COMMITTED online stalker.”  “I crave information,” she says, “and sometimes that’s not a good thing.”  Ah, technology – creating new armchair detectives with every Google search.

Whether or not you’ve ever used Match.com (which I assume you haven’t, given that it’s within the purview of the 45-64 demo), you’ve probably noticed the growing range and influence of methods for gathering information on your crushes.  Or your exes.  Or their exes.

As the first generation to grow up instant messaging (or furtively checking away messages.  Every 15 minutes. Until 4 am.), technology has seeped so deeply into our daily lives, we barely realize it.  But if you look carefully, it has influenced almost every aspect of our dating lives.

From the moment you first meet a possibility (whether they’re a date, future significant other, or someone you just want to see naked), you type their name into Google.  Then Yahoo. No luck?  My friend (the stalker) advises that you “try their name plus the state they live in.  Or their email address plus their college.”

Or you could just go straight to the good stuff – their Myspace, Friendster and Facebook profiles, where you can find out literally everything about him – what team he bats for, whether he wants “random play,” how often he and his friends play beer pong … or her – whether she still speaks to her exes (extra points if she doesn’t), her binge drink of choice, and what classes you’ll have to pretend to be in to talk to her.

Need more info?  Check out their Amazon.com wish list (the stalking tool of champions).  Just type her first and last name into Amazon to see what books / DVDs / questionable materials she desires.  (Also a good place to find out what she’s into – gardening, books recommended by Oprah, lesbians).  Not a bad way to choose her birthday gift, either.  Unless it’s the aforementioned lesbian books, in which case I recommend immediately scheduling a threesome.  It may be your only chance.

Beyond sheer information gathering, technology enables the phone-phobic among us to have entire conversations – through email, IM, or text messaging – without uttering a single audible word.  Besides, says my friend Meghan, “you can be so much wittier over text messages than you can be on the phone.”  I have to agree with her on that, although I doubt that adequately excuses telling my last boyfriend “I love you” for the first time … by text message.  Tacky?  Or the method of choice for the future? 

Mindy, a senior and the sex columnist at UC Berkley, thinks it’s the latter.  (FYI, I think it’s both.)  She started dating her boyfriend because he sent her an e-mail through Myspace.  “Sites like those take the pressure away from having to call,” she says.   While there is still a “big stigma” about dating websites, Mindy alleges, “there isn’t any when it comes to getting to know the people in your own school community better on sites like Facebook.”

The other benefit of “internet love,” as Mindy calls it, is that “it puts the emphasis on conversation and the written word.  If you can talk on AIM with someone for hours and
not get bored, you've probably got something going there and it’s not just physical attraction.”

Still, she admits that most of the fellow students she knows use the internet to “flirt randomly or hookup” rather than build a relationship (Shocking!  Do underage students drink beer as well?!?).  “It can be an exciting and mysterious way to meet people outside your circle of friends so there's no gossip when the affair is over.”  Oh Mindy, Mindy.  What’s the fun of breaking up with no gossip??

There are downsides to technology, according to Miriam, a sophomore and the dating columnist at Columbia University.  “It’s so much easier to hide behind the technological screen.  It’s not like you have to get someone's number the first time you meet them at the bar or at a frat party anymore.  You can always facebook them.  It's ridiculous.”

Still, she admits to “obsessively creating” her own Facebook profile and being unhealthily preoccupied with her email account.  “I guess it's the price we pay for modern love.”

Excuse me, I have to go update my Amazon.com wishlist.

Ah...the Internet. What did we do without it?

In Your Face! The College Entrepreneurs of Facebook

COED MAGAZINE
MARCH 2006
BY JULIA ALLISON

Little more than two years ago, Harvard roommates Mark Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes were all fairly normal college sophomores.  They slept in, they studied occasionally, and for 10 days during winter finals they rallied around Mark as he programmed a little website called … Facebook.

Ah, Facebook.  Launched to the world of Harvard (is there another?) on February 4th, 2004, it has since expanded to more than 2,100 campuses and become a bona fide phenomenon.  A sensation.  A revolution.  And for millions of college students fighting against the powerful pull of procrastination, an obsession.

If you haven’t heard of Facebook, put down your Sony PSP immediately and log on.  Growing at the speed of mold in your dorm shower, Facebook currently has 5 million registered users, almost all of them college students or recent grads.

Officially, “Facebook is an online directory that connects people through social networks at schools.”  Of course, that bland one-sentence tag line does little to explain it’s infectious popularity, or why it’s ranked seventh in traffic amongst all – ALL – websites on the entire internet, one spot behind Google.  If you’ve been on it, you know why it’s addictive.  But how did this tangled web of too-much-time-on-their-hands profiles, photos and comments come to be?

Hughes, a senior at Harvard and the official spokesperson for company, explains that Facebook was “just a fun project Mark was thinking about for school.”  (Wouldn’t it be great if all fun projects undertaken while studying for finals made their college founders millionaires?  I guess perfecting Beirut doesn’t have much market value.)

When three weeks later 6,000 Harvard students had already signed up, it seemed clear to the founders that their little idea might “become pretty big.”  That summer the three trekked out West to Palo Alto, scene of all things Internet, where they spent their days solidifying the rapidly expanding site.  When it came time to re-enroll for the fall, Zuckerberg and Moskovitz made a Bill Gatesian decision to not to go back.

“It was clear at that point that the continuous work on the site was not abating,” says Moskovitz.  “It only took me about ten minutes to decide that if I went back to school I would almost certainly fail all my classes, and after that there was no looking back.  Hughes was the lone member of the triad to return, offering guidance from a distance.

Later that year, Peter Thiel, founder of Pay Pal and all around rich guy, gave Zuckerberg and his nascent company $500,000 in start-up cash for servers and, we assume, beer.  Several months after that, they were approached by hordes of investors all throwing money at the idea.  By 2005, they had 12.7 million dollars in venture capital and an alleged valuation of $100 million plus, made all the more believable by MySpace’s recent jaw-dropping $580 million sale to News Corp.

Currently Facebook.com has 60 employees, almost all older than the founders themselves, with a revenue stream consisting solely of advertisers, although they will not disclose how much.

According to Hughes, “we try to keep the advertising as rare as possible – we want it to not bust up in the users face every time they log on.  We’re never going to have pop-ups.”

Facebook doesn’t consider Myspace or Friendster to be in direct competition with them, although the idea of merging has been raised by more than one outsider.  As for plans for the future, the baby moguls are keeping their cards close to their (hairless?) chests.  “We are developing ideas [both] small scale and big scale,” says Hughes, while continuing to engineer the network so they are “responsive to day to day life of users, perhaps even more so than they are now.”

For would be college entrepreneurs, Moskovitz offers the following advice “Don't try to do too many things at once. If you overextend yourself, you'll fail at all your goals.”

Although they occasionally get offers to sell, they’re not interested at this moment.  For one, “Facebook is priceless,” says Moskovitz.  More importantly, “We’re just having fun doing what we’re doing,” says Hughes.

Don’t think they’re just playing around, though.  “A few years from now,” says Moskovitz, “we'll hopefully look back on this as a time when Facebook was relatively small.”  Bill Gates is quaking in his boots.

SIDEBAR: Booty Logging?

Given that 70% of Facebook users log on every single day, there must be something they’re logging on to see. According to Hughes, it could be a host of different reasons: “for fun or a name comes up in conversation or because they need certain information.”  Yes, like the number of that girl you wanted to booty call.

“Sure,” says Hughes, “that’s definitely one of the reasons people log on.  You meet someone at a party and then you like talking to them for five or ten minutes, so you go on Facebook to get more info.  I think that happens all the time.”

In other words, never, ever underestimate human kind’s fascination with the possibility of getting laid.  Of course, it’s more than just that – Facebook continually adds new gizmos and tools to show off yourself (from your own profile to your own online photo albums), your friends (from a running tally of how many you have to descriptions of how you know them next to each of their photos), and your wit (the sarcastically esoteric “clubs,” intra-Facebook messaging and of course, the wall posts).  After all, if there’s one thing we like more than getting laid, it’s ourselves.

THE FOUNDERS THEMSELVES

With the exception of the “About” section, the following are quotes from their REAL Facebook entries.

*Mark Zuckerberg

Job: “Kind of a big deal at facebook”
Geography: San Francisco, CA
School: Harvard ’06
Status: Dropout
Birthday: 05.14.84
Concentration: Psychology / Computer Science
Clubs and Jobs: just facebook
Favorite Books: mostly books about smart people
Favorite Quote: never run out of ammo
Interests: minimalism, meditation, driving, writing, making things, social dynamics, culture, information flow, lockdown, domination

About: Zuckerberg, for his part, follows a long tradition of painfully awkward technology start up founders, and was too cool to interview with COED.  According to Hughes, he only interviews with important, national media like “The New Yorker,” and “USA Today.”  Hmm … last time I checked COED was distributed all across the country, which would technically constitute it as “national.”  But that’s splitting hairs.  In an interview with Marketwatch, a website owned by Dow Jones, Zuckerberg, who engages frequently in up-talk (where one’s statements sound like questions) wore a shirt that said simply, “My mother thinks I’m cool.”  She’s the only one, Mark.

*Chris Hughes

Job: Facebook Spokesperson, “Empath”
Geography: Boston, MA
School: Harvard '06
Status: Still trying to finish
Major: History and Literature
Birthday: 11.26.83
Interests: espresso, algiers, new york, vanity fair, harper's, balance bars, cafés, french fries, far left politics, bojangles, modern art, technology, sweatshirts, dinners with wine, newspapers, wandering, american literature, baudelaire, streets

About: Hughes, not the most eloquent of spokespeople, has an attitude one might expect from President Bush’s handlers – that is to say, snobby, too-good-for-you, and generally incompetent.  When asked what his official position at the company was, he said – and I quote, “Right now I just work as spokesperson and you know, generally hang out, give some advice.”  When I wondered whether he gets paid for “generally hanging out” he got offended and insisted “it’s a job, we’re a real company.”  Please do your real company a favor and take some media training classes.

*Dustin Moskovitz

Job: General Go-to Guy, “Keeper”  “I make sure everything works and is kept clean and good.”
Geography: San Francisco, CA
School: Harvard '06
Status: Dropout
Major: Economics
Birthday: 05.22.84
Political Views: Very Liberal
Favorite Movies: Zoolander, Gladiator, Top Gun, Garden State, Troy, Pulp Fiction, The Godfather
Interests: parks, free music, being secular, top gun, the mafia, reading, art, mountain biking, scuba, snowboarding, flicking matches

About: Moskovitz insists that the he and his fellow founders are not “geeks,” but instead “very well rounded,” and supports that by insisting “none of us were even computer science majors.”  Well, Dustin, you don’t have to be a computer science major to be a geek.